And while that will be settled in the courts, much has already been
said today in the House as members debated this extraordinary piece of legislation.
Here are a few excerpts starting out with the Opposition Leader who acknowledged
his family’s interests in a phone company, specifically Speednet or as
its known, SMART.
Hon. Johnny Briceno, Leader of the Opposition
“There are certain issues that I think we need to bring up that jumps
to my mind, issues of concern as a member of this National Assembly, as a Belizean,
as a concern for our country and the whole issue of nationalization, the principle
of nationalization because if we were to look at the histories of nationalization,
there are very few cases where it has worked.
That when we take on these fights, I think that it can have serious repercussions
outside of Belize because certainly I believe that a lot of or there is going
to be a number of Belizeans that would be supportive in this issue of requiring
or nationalizing BTL. But I don’t think that we’re sufficient enough
as a player in the world economy that we can just one day decide that we can
go into nationalizing a company. The point is Mr. Speaker that once you start,
it would be so easy to continue to do that as using that to be able to solve
your problems. So certainly on that principle Mr. Speaker, I have a concern.
As we know already our economy has slowed down considerable, there is little confidence in the private sector as we speak and when we take these issues again
I certainly believe it is going to have a negative impact on the investment
climate in Belize.”
Hon. Michael Finnegan, Minister of Housing
“Mr. Speaker this was a agonizing decision. It was not an easy decision
because no government wants to get up today or tomorrow or yesterday and interfere
with private entities operating in their country. But this government felt that
this was the only way to go to bring an end to the chaos that was happening
in the telecommunication industry. Mr. Speaker the bill is simply the government
will be taking over the Belize Telecommunications Industry, Telemedia. But the
Leader of the Opposition just said that we are a small country and we are not
a big player in the world of things and that I want to agree with. But it comes
a time in life when a man has to claim his dignity and claim his pride and stand
up on his foot, and say what I got I got and I will be a man.”
Hon. Francis Fonseca, Freetown Area Representative.
“You said that obviously one of the issues foremost in your mind and
in the mind of the government is the issue of putting an end to the endless
litigation and we know abut that on this side of the House, we’ve beenengaged in legal battles with Michael Ashcroft since 2001 and some of those
battles ended in bad agreements, I would say, bad agreements and today I hope
you’re not making that mistake as well. So the question is will this in
fact put an end to those legal challenges or will it in fact create a new round
of legal challenges, a new series of legal, constitutional and other wise battles.
That is a very important question I think the Belizean people have a right to
hear about because one of the primary arguments being advanced for the move
today is that we’re going to put an end to litigation. But is that in
fact so, are we not in fact entering into a new era of litigation.”
Hon. Dean Barrow, Prime Minister
“How come the member for Freetown had no interest in discussing with
his constituency or sharing with the people of this country any of the several
multiple agreements that his government signed in secret.”
Hon. Patrick Faber, Minister of Education
“Mr. Speaker the Member from Freetown spoke about what it would cost
and where we would we get the money and he even mentioned that the private sector
may not be able to handle it. Mr. Speaker we want to be clear about that, we
want to be open about that because we are fully cognizant, in fact this was
the intention some years when the company was first privatized that we understand
fully well that there will be maybe the necessity for foreign companies that
have the knowledge, that have the technical know how, that have the financial
capital to invest to invest in a company like BTL. We are aware of that and
we aren’t saying no to that but one thing you can be assure of is under
the UDP government no one entity will control the company in such a way as Michael Ashcroft and Prosser and all of these others were given the opportunity to do
by that last administration.”
Hon. John Saldivar, Minister of Public Service
“And I know Mr. Speaker that Mr. Ashcroft is right now screaming bloody
murder, now that he knows of our intention and I know that he will do his darnest
to smear the good name of the people of Belize with potential foreign investors.
But Mr. Speaker I dare say it is a small price to pay to give assurance to our
Belizean people that this government, this Cabinet, and our Prime Minister are
loyal to only one people and that is the Belizean people.
Then the Leader of the Opposition, I can’t understand his concern
about us being a small country and seems to be suggesting to me Mr. Speaker
that because we are a small country, we must capitulate to the whim and fancies
of these billionaire investors. Mr. Speaker I am happy to know that the Belizean
people would never put a wimp like that in charge of this country.”
Hon. Wilfred Sedi Elrington, Attorney General & Minister of Foreign
Affairs
“We firmly believe in the right to property and we firmly believe
in access to the court so that whatever is done pursuant to this law, there
will have to be provisions for adequate compensation to the owners of the property
that will ultimately become under the government’s possession and those
owners will have the right to go to court, not only to challenge the acquisition
but also to challenge the quantum that’s being offered in compensation.
So that no harm really is being done, this is a perfectly natural and normal
exercise of the democratic process.”
Hon. Dean Barrow,
“You say that the UDP was bankrolled. Yes, I have not denied that
because unlike you people, I don’t lie to the people of this country. But remember that I stood in this house from early as the time of the UHS guarantee
and made it clear I had worked as a lawyer for Michael Ashcroft, I have received
financial contributions for the UDP from Michael Ashcroft but I oppose with
every fibre of my being that UHS and I made it clear. It is part of the democratic
process that investors would want to contribute to a political party. No such
contribution can handcuff me, no such contribution can padlock me, and no such
contribution will ever cause me to betray the interests of the people of this
country.
Notwithstanding that, that was well before the election, when we came to
go into the election Michael Ashcroft contributed again, he can’t claim
to not have known where I stood. It was on record, I said it over and over in
this House. He never told me when he contributed about the secret agreement
but what, could he seriously have expected that after I discovered those agreements,
because he had contributed substantially to the party, I would have countenanced
and supported those agreements, man he could never have known me. He could not
have known me. For years he had been a client of mine. For years, I might even
say he might have been a friend of mine, but obviously he did not know this
friend. Nothing will ever cause me to shirk my duty to the people of this country.”
And while PM Barrow made it clear that he was not beholden to a campaign
donor he described as substantial, he made it clear that opposition leader Briceno
is in a different position.