7 News Belize

Armed Police And BDF Guard Court For Mexican Accused
posted (February 26, 2013)
This morning, the Belize City courthouse was secured by heavily armed and masked police and BDF; they were preparing for the worse because 22 year old Mexican, Zurisaday Villasenor Mendez was brought to the Belize City Court for trial.

You may recall his name: police say he was caught with an arsenal of weapons, cocaine, and marijuana at the Corozal Free Zone. That happened on on, 30 of 2012, when Corozal police raided 2 rooms at the Las Vegas Hotel in the Corozal Free Zone where they found 7 guns - which included AK-47's - 12 magazines, 144 bullets, several small quantities of marijuana, cocaine, and communication equipment. Mendez was suspected to be connected to all of these items, but in the end, he was only charged for the illegal items found in the room he was in. Those charges included 1 count of keeping an unlicensed firearm, 1 count of keeping unlicensed ammunition, 1 count of keeping a prohibited firearm, 1 count of keeping prohibited ammunition, possession of control drugs, and drug trafficking. For the past 3 months, He has been standing trial in the Corozal Magistrate's Court, with the Cayo Magistrate transferred from San Ignacio just to preside over the case.

But today, his trial was moved to the Belize City Magistrate's Court where more than 20 heavily armed officers of the Belize Special Assignment Group and Special Patrol Unit escorted him to court and restricted civilian and press movement in and around the court. Mendez's attorney, Arthur Saldivar, told the media today that the case was moved to the city because the sitting Magistrate believes that there may be a threat to her safety. He believes that this fear means his client cannot get a fair trial. Here's how he explained it:

Arthur Saldivar, Attorney for the Defense
"What has occurred is that by virtue of a conversation that was held between myself and the magistrate yesterday where she had called me - she had indicated that the police informed her that there was a threat to her safety in Corozal. As a result of that threat and her belief that her safety was in jeopardy she made the move to transfer the case to Belie City. Still to this moment we have not been given any indication as to what type of threat was levied and how it was communicated. In fact my understanding is that this was not a threat that was communicated to her but something along the level of a suspicion and we know how the police are with suspicion. Everybody is a suspect, so this was the condition under which this matter was moved to Belize City. The way our system of law works, the arbiter of justice and in this case the magistrate is both the judge of law and the judge of fact. She cannot be operating under any circumstance where fear or favor, affection or ill will forms an influence on a decision that is made. In this regard we already see that a decision was made out of fear and that decision was to move the case from Corozal to Belize, so the fear that she has spoken of has manifested itself already in a decision made to move the case. I that regard the likelihood of a fair trial or a decision that is levied without the taint of that imposition is unlikely and is not something that stands within the realm of the law to uphold. What is most tragic about the situation is that is for the Government of Belize to provide for the courts, so a magistrate exhibiting fear to the extent that she cannot conduct and discharge her function is an indictment on the Government of Belize in that it suggests that the Government lacks the ability to safeguard the process of the courts and the process of the law."

And that fear of a mistrial was not the only issue that attorneys Arthur Saldivar and Dickie Bradley raised today. The defence was supposed to begin presenting their case, but instead of that happening, Saldivar came back to court to make a submission that a matter be heard in the Supreme Court on whether or not the sitting Magistrate was able to dispense justice in a constitutional manner.

His contention was that the Magistrate was a contract officer, and as a result she didn't have security of tenure. And by extension, this Magistrate, in Saldivar's opinion, was not independent and impartial, thus his clients constitutional rights to a fair trial was being infringed upon. That submission caused a heated back and forth, but ultimately all parties agreed that this constitutional challenge must be made before the Supreme Court. So, at this point, the case is at a stand-still where the prosecution has already presented and closed its case - and the defence is trying to go to a higher court.

This constitutional challenge has not yet been scheduled at the Supreme Court.

Home | Archives | Downloads/Podcasts | Advertise | Contact Us

7 News Belize